Monday, December 28, 2020

Return to:

University of Iowa Sialogram Classification (Grading Scale)

Addressing Ductal Stenosis - adaptable for Parotid and Submandibular Sialograms

1º (main duct): segment of duct from the oral cavity to the first major bifurcation

2º (secondary): segment of duct proximal to first major bifurcation and distal to second bifurcation

 3º (tertiary): any duct proximal to the second bifurcation (including those that could be considered quaternary)

Slide1_92.PNG

 

submandibular duct classification 01 03 2020.png

Adapted Scoring System

Adapted from Foggia et al (Foggia 2020), Thorpe et al (Thorpe 2020), and Blatt et al (Blatt 1956)

Score

Location of  Stenosis

  (diagram      below)

    Degree            of      Stenosis

Retention of Contrast

Peripheral Duct Dilation

0No stenosisNo stenosisNoneNone
1Tertiary or quaternary ductMinimal     <25% stenoticFocal retention pockets Punctate dilation                       < 1 mm diamter
2Secondary  duct     Mild              25-50% stenoticIndistict retention  Globular dilation                        1-2 mm diameter
3      Main             duct   Moderate        50-75% stenoticN/ACoalescent                 irregularly shaped globules         > 2mm diameter
4N/ASevere >75% stenoticN/A       Destructive                      of gland parenchyma

Classification Systems Based on Sialendoscopy Findings

  • Koch et al (Koch 2008, Koch 2009, Koch 2012, Koch 2020) - Stensen's duct stenosis (Koch et al 2009) based on sialendoscopy evaluation of tissue quality/luminal narrowing, extent, number, location and considerations for etiology
    • Type I: Inflammation dominated with variable narrowing of the lumen; slight fibrotic remodeling; obstructive plaques
    • Type II: Fibrotic stenosis, often short segment and web-associated, predominant incomplete (luminal narrowing <50%); circular or web-like encroachments of the duct wall, megaduct
    • Type III: Fibrotic stenosis, massive fibrotic reaction of the duct wall - predominantly high-grad luminal narrowing >50%
  • Kopec et al 2013 (Kopec 2013) proposal for classification of stenoses of Wharton's duct based on site of stenosis - which they also applied to Stensen's duct
    • Based on evaluation via sialendoscopy (done under local anesthesia with 1.0 to 1.6 mm modular semirigid sialendoscopes) of stenosis of submandibular gland (24 patients) and parotid gland (27 patients)
      • 'A stenosis was diagnosed when the duct was not passable with the 1.0 mm sialoendoscope and with additional instrumental dilatation'
    • Kopec et al (Kopec 2013) employed a Modification of Koch et al classification (Koch 2008, Koch 2009) dividing ducts into three parts
      • Determined by measurements during sialendoscopy (mentioned it was possible due to shaft of sialoendoscope marked in cm)
        • Papilla/distal
        • Middle
        • Proximal/hilum
        • Diffuse

Kopec et al 2013

Ductal Stenosis Classification

Parotid

(Stensen's Duct)

Submandibular

(Wharton's Duct)

1st segment

Papilla up to 1 cm

(before passing through the buccinator)

Papilla up to 1 cm
2nd segment

Middle

(area of buccinator to 2 cm behind it) 

Middle

(between 2 and 4 cm)

3rd segmentHilum

Proximal

(from 1 cm before the hilum up to the hilar system)

 

  • Marchal et al (Marchal 2007, 2008, 2009)
    • Classification based on site of stenosis (main or accessory duct), extent and number (adapted from Kopec 2013 referring for French publication Marchal 2009)
      • Marchal 2007: Classified strictures of both parotid and submandibular glands into 4 types

Adapted from Marchal (2009)                   

Description

Comment

Type IMembranous stricturethin/localized - usually in second and higher generation branches
Type IILarge strictureless than 1 cm - usually affecting main duct
Type IIIDiffuse stenosis of main ductnormal intraglandular ductal system
Type  IV          (a/b)         Diffuse generalized stenosisaffecting whole ductal system
Type IV aDiffuse generalized stenosis without localized stricturesdiffuse reduction of caliber without other strictures
Type IV bDiffuse generalized stenosis with multiple localized stricturesdiffuse reduction of caliber associated with irregular strictures
  • "L-S-D" Classification
    • Marchal et al (Marchal 2008) (L = Lithiasis; S = Stenosis; D = Endoscopic Classification of Dilatation)
      • L0= Duct free of stone; L1= Floating stone; L2= Fixed stone, totally visible (L2a < 8mm / L2b > 8mm); L3 Fixed stone partially visible (L3a palpable / L3b not palpable)
      • S0= No stenosis; S1= Intraductal Diaphragmatic stenosis (may be multiple); S2= Unique ductal stenosis (main duct); S3 Multiple of diffuse ductal stenosis (main duct); S4 Generalized ductal
      • D0= No dilatation; D1 Unique; D2 Multiple; D3 Generalized
  • Ngu et al (Ngu 2007)
    • Dental Radiology Department (London teaching hospital); salivary duct stricture defined: "a narrowing of the duct to such a degree as to cause impairment or obstruction to the normal smooth out-flow of saliva"
      • Classified as single or multiple affecting zones: 'anterior third'; 'middle third'; 'posterior third including hilum'
      • 10 year (ending 2004) retrospective study of all patients identifying 1,362 sialograms performed on patients with 'obstructive symptoms': 877 (64.4%) with sialographic findings of benign intradcutal obstruction (485 were normal)
        • 642/877 (73.2%) due to salivary calculi
        • 198/877 (22.6%) 'ductal strictures as the primary cause of obstruction
        • 37/877 (4.2%) mucous plugs
  • Single strictures 132 (66.7%); Multiple strictures 66 (33.3%); most common site for parotid was middle third (41%); most common site for submandibular was posterior third/hilum
  • Sialogram technique: 'patient upright in dental chair with three radiographs taken of the lgand using and intraoral X-ray tube - two oblique lateral views and one anteroposterior radiograph - then reviewed in darkened room by transmitted light and with a x2 magnification available.

References

Thorpe RK, Foggia MJ, Marcus KS, Policeni B, Maley JE, Hoffman HT. Sialographic Analysis of Radioiodine-Associated Chronic Sialadenitis. Laryngoscope. 2020 Nov 17. doi: 10.1002/lary.29279. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33200832.

Foggia MJ, Peterson J, Maley J, Policeni B, Hoffman HT. Sialographic analysis of parotid ductal abnormalities associated with Sjogren's syndrome. Oral Dis. 2020 Jul;26(5):912-919. doi: 10.1111/odi.13298. Epub 2020 Mar 3. PMID: 32031309.

Truong K, Hoffman HT, Policeni B, Maley J. Radiocontrast Dye Extravasation During Sialography. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 Mar;127(3):192-199. doi: 10.1177/0003489417752711. Epub 2018 Jan 7. PMID: 29308655.

Choi JS, Choi YG, Kim YM, Lim JY. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of sialendoscopy in salivary duct stenosis. Laryngoscope. 2018 Apr;128(4):878-884. doi: 10.1002/lary.26897. Epub 2017 Oct 8. PMID: 28988448.

Blatt, I. M., French, A. J., Holt, J. F., Maxwell, J. H., & Rubin, P. (1956). Secretory sialography in diseases of the major salivary glands. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 65(2), 295–317. https:// doi.org/10.1177/000348945606500201

Koch M, Iro H, and Zenk J: Sialendoscopy-based diagnosis and classification of parotid duct stenosis. Laryngoscope 2009 Sep;119(9):1696-703

Kopec T, Szyfter W, Wierzbicka M, and Nealis J: Stenoses of the salivary ducts-sialendoscopy based diagnosis and treatment.  British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery  Volume 51, Issue 7, October 2013

Koch M, Iro H, Kunzel J, Psychogios G, Bozzato A, and Zenk J: Diagnosis and gland-preservjng minimally invasive therapy for Wharton's duct stenoses. Laryngoscope 122 (2012) pp 552-558

Koch M, Iro H, Zenk J. Role of Sialoscopy in the Treatment of Stensen’s Duct Strictures. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 2008;117(4):271-278. doi:10.1177/000348940811700406

Marchal F, C. Chossegros, F. Faure, B. Delas, A. Bizeau, B. Mortensen, et al.Publié Sous l’Egide de la Société Européenne des Glandes Salivaires, Salivary stones and stenosis. A comprehensive classification (in French)

Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac, 110 (2009), pp. 1-4

Ngu RK, Brown JE, Whaites EJ, Drage NA, Ng SY, Makdissi J. Salivary duct strictures: nature and incidence in benign salivary obstruction. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007 Feb;36(2):63-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/24118767. PMID: 17403881.

Koch M, Zenk J, Iro H. Stenosis and stenosis-like lesions in the submandibular duct: Detailed clinical and sialendoscopy-based analysis and proposal for a classification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020 Nov;130(5):486-495. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 Jun 5. PMID: 32665204.

Marchal F  Chapter 6 Sialendoscopy pp 128-145 in Salivary Gland Disorders eds Myers EN and Ferris RL  Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007 

Marchal F, Chossegros C, Faure F, Delas B, Bizeau A, Mortensen B, Schaitkin B, Buchwald C, Cenjor C, Yu C, Campisi D, Eisele D, Greger D, Trikeriotis D, Pabst G, Kolenda J, Hagemann M, Tarabichi M, Guntinas-Lichius O, Homoe P, Carrau R, Irvine R, Studer R, Wang S, Fischer U, Van der Poorten V, Saban Y, Barki G. Salivary stones and stenosis. A comprehensive classification. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 2008 Sep;109(4):233-6. doi: 10.1016/j.stomax.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Sep 5. PMID: 18774150.